SciOps.

​Everybody's being told. Told by who? The Psyops Cops. Fuck it. If you cant beat em join em. And whatever you do, dont fret. Not yet anyway. So the YouTube video on PsyOps is at the other end of the hyperlink on this page. Remember tge sheer force of two things in life: Communist propaganda and Denial. So then Shane reads the exam results in part on his computer saying out loud on the phone:  Denied...worsened in [unintelligible]. Said they didnt consider any of the other 4 passages to service connection.  5 ways to prove it and two of them are Direct and By Aggravation. Another way is  Secondary, Presumptive or an 1151 issue. AKA Injuries resulting from VHA healthcare. 1151 refers to a claim under that statute. Section 1151 or an 1151 claim. See how many time i spoke in small circles in the context of this posting? So he said she said, " worsened during service" and he went radio silent. He did exclaim, "Thats ridiculous" emphatically when he realized that the VA machinery apparently erred because they didnt consider the aggravation provision of the rules. Google that! Good luck. ill have to try it later to find a legal reference for that. The part that requires Raters to automatically consider all theories or maybe it says something else. Point is...those decision makers arent gonna spend that much time to do that. I could go into details but full separare treatment of that shit is another issue and post. Look for it soon. But back to where i was, Worsened. Key word. Or was aggravated by and military service or events therein logically foolows. Semantically. And semantics in complex systems such as VBA and VA and VHA line goes dead